Seems to remind me of good pastry or Grandma's pancakes, with a touch of raisin and vanilla.
Browse Search Users Contact Us Reviews: 91018 Tobaccos: 7788 What's New Login Register. Sutliff's Pumpkin Spice is a mellow blend of burley, Virginia and black cavendish that's imbued with the flavors of pumpkin and the spices that usually accompany it. In my opinion its similar to Lane 1Q and if you enjoy mild aromatics this is one tobacco worth trying. An unlit sip of the pipe also revealed similar flavors.Even before I allowed this to dry some, it was easy to light. I enjoy smoking a pipe of this tobacco when im looking for a mild tobacco or during the morning hours. Although the blend is badged as a Ribbon there's a fair few larger, leafy, pieces in the pouch. And yet, I'm gratified with it and satisfied with its smooth smoking quality. The tobaccos are sublimated, but I did notice a little grass and citrus from the Virginia with a mild nuttiness and molasses from the burley. Just beneath the casing are the tobacco flavors... still easily detectable, and married perfectly. Complex, nuanced and not overly flavored like most other aromatics such as those from Peterson and Mac Baren. An easy going all day smoke.This was the third tobacco I tried. The temperature's extremely cool, and there's not a bite to be had; for me that is.I enjoy this, but in a market as crowded as it is with vanilla blends a new one to my palate needs to have the X-Factor to get full marks. All I say to say is this is why i got into pipe smoking.
A very enjoyable aromatic, perfect for beginning pipe smokers, aromatic lovers, or a change of pace.The first bowl of this Altadis blend was probably the only one I would somewhat recommend. I don't care for the long ribbon cut.
The flavor is subtle, vanilla undertones of honey. High quality.
The aroma from the pouch was mostly anise with a very faint vanilla undertone. the smell reminds me of good day hanging around my grandfather and his friends it has that old fashioned smell and taste. This is one of those blends that's so indulgent the fear of weight gain arises after a bowl!
The pouch smells heavier with maple, the rum is borderline unnoticeable. At first I have to admit I wasn't much of a fan it didn't seem to have much of a taste. The wife tells me the room note is quite good. There's a far higher amount of Burley and Virginia compared to black Cavendish. And it scores brownie points with the Mrs. as well! It's a little difficult to review this without writing what's already been said, but I'll give it a bash! 6 people found this review helpful. That word … Both have a artificial topping taste, with 1-M's being more chemical in nature.This was a far better experience from the last time I had a Sutliff product, but it still tasted cheap and left me worrying about what chemicals produced the flavor that stayed on my saliva and gave me a little cough.I'd say that JimInks pretty much nailed the description of this fine smoke. It does seem to sweeten even more after the first 1/3 and becomes even more enjoyable. A long time ago I had the misfortune of smoking a Sutliff creation that had left me avoiding their stuff at all costs. In regard to the "secret" flavoring, four different vanillas were used in the topping, one being cocoa, and I also sense a hint of marshmallow. As many others have compared this to Lane 1Q, I will do the same, and right up front say that I would prefer 1Q to this. Sutliff Tobacco Company - 1-M Vanilla. The room note is delicious, upon experiencing the lingering scent I can only imagine that even non-smokers wish they could smoke this...it smells like a tobacco store, (the whole store!!!) It is not over-the-top in flavoring and provides a nice sweet undertone with the vanilla note. Recently however, I decided to purchase a P&C deal that "battled" Lane's 1Q with Sutliff's vanilla counterpart. There may be a hint of caramel. My review is based on the tobacco itself with no recollection of ever having smoked the original. Sutliff Tobacco Company - Rum & Maple. Published review content of this website is considered the copyright intellectual property of the reviewer and SpecComm International and may not be reproduced in any manner without the expressed written consent of SpecComm International.